Skip to main content

Space Expansion

How can we see something from the origin of the universe? If light was emitted from that origin, it would travel out from it at the speed of light. Our Earth would evolve billions of years later, meaning the light of the big bang has long since passed us by. The big bang didn't happen at a single point in our universe but throughout all of space, which was at that time contracted to a single point. Therefore, light is not traveling "outward" from a single "center" but rather from all of space.
The expansion of the universe applies to intergalactic space but NOT the things in it, which are held together by the other forces of nature: gravity, electromagnetism and the strong force. According to Einstein's Theory of Relativity, although things "in space" cannot travel faster than the speed of light, space itself is unrestricted and can expand beyond this "speed limit". Entire galaxy clusters that are very, very distant may be "carried away" from us at faster-than-light speeds as the universe expands and in this case, we will never see them: their light itself is travelling slower than the expansion rate creating more distance between us per second than light can traverse in the same time. Such light has a losing battle trying to get to us, and therefore we will never see it. This "cosmic distance limit" defines the dimensions of our "Observable Universe": all objects in the universe beyond that distance are undetectable.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Domains

The building blocks required to achieve success in a business domain and differentiate the company from its competitors:  Core domains : The interesting problems. These are the in-house activities the company is performing differently from its competitors and from which it gains its competitive advantage.  Generic domains : The solved problems. These are the things all companies are doing in the same way. There is no room or need for innovation here; rather than creating in-house implementations, it’s more cost-effective to adopt \ buy existing solutions. Supporting domains: The problems with obvious solutions. These are the activities the company likely has to implement in-house or outsourced, but that do not provide any competitive advantage. Domain experts are subject matter experts who know all the intricacies of the business that we are going to model and implement in code. In other words, domain experts are knowledge authorities in the software’s business domain. T
Post a Comment
Read more

Meaning

Of all the information that every second flows into our brains from our sensory organs, only a fraction arrives in our consciousness: the ratio of the capacity of perception to the capacity of apperception is at best a million to one. A million times more bits enter our heads than consciousness perceives. Consciousness lags behind what we call reality. It takes half a second to become conscious of something, though that is not how we perceive it. Outside our conscious awareness, an advanced illusion rearranges events in time. Our consciousness lags behind because it has to present us with a picture of the surrounding world that is relevant. But it is precisely a picture of the surrounding world it presents us with, not a picture of all the superb work the brain does. The sequence is: sensation, simulation, experience. But it is not relevant to know about the simulation, so that is left out of our experience, which consists of an edited sensation that we experience as unedited. What we
Post a Comment
Read more

The Evolution of Cooperation

The Tragedy of the Commons occurs when a group’s individual incentives lead them to take actions which, in aggregate, lead to negative consequences for all group members. It is a multi-player version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma. In the version of the game from which it got its name, the players are two prisoners, held in separate cells. Each has to choose between “cooperating” with the other (keeping quiet) or “defecting” (giving evidence against the other). Each makes the choice without knowing what the other will do. If both prisoners keep quiet, they are each sentenced to one year in prison. If one rats on the other, he or she goes free and the other gets 10 years. If they both rat on each other, they each get 5 years. The problem arises because whatever your opponent does, defecting gives you a higher payoff than cooperating.  In 1984 Robert Axelrod published a book called The Evolution of Cooperation, which contained a surprising reflection: if you play a Prisoner’s Dilemma game, n
Post a Comment
Read more